MPS denying GPHA of reefer container revenues, MDU

The Maritime and Dockworkers’ Union (MDU) of the Ghana Trades Union Congress (TUC) says the Meridian Ports and Services (MPS) has taken over handling of reefer containers at the expense of Ghana Ports and Harbours Authority (GPHA) revenue mobilization.

The MDU revealed this on Monday at a press conference on the negotiations for the review of unfavourable clauses in the MPS terminal three concession agreement.

Mr Daniel Owusu-Koranteng, General Secretary, MDU, indicated that through some unproven allegations of reefer containers getting missing from the Reefer Terminal of GPHA, “The Ghana Revenue Authority has put up measures which had placed the handling of Reefer Containers in the hands of MPS in Terminal 3 thus denying GPHA of huge revenues though Reefer Containers are not covered by the concession agreement”.

Mr Owusu-Koranteng added that by that arrangement, MPS had become the beneficiary of revenues accruing from the reefer container business, which they described as a bonus on to top of the generous incentives provided in the concession agreement.

He recounted that the GPHA constructed its reefer terminal which had a capacity of 800 TEUs (Twenty Foot Equivalent Units) equipped with two generators with generating power capacity of 1.2MVA.

He added that the terminal generated substantial revenues to the GPHA in the form of electricity charges, rent, ICD handling charges, handling charges, and transfer charges among others.

They therefore “call on government to find a solution to the takeover of the Reefer Container business from GPHA under the cloak of loss of reefer containers as a matter of urgency” adding that genuine security lapses at the GPHA reefer container terminal must be fixed if they truly existed.

The Union stressed that “the directive of Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA) on Reefer Container Business amounts to throwing away the baby with the bathwater”.

Touching on the ongoing negotiation of the concession, he reminded government that MPS terminal three project was a good project with a bad agreement noting that it would result in the loss of substantial revenues of GPHA as there would be reduction of stevedoring, shore handling works, port dues, terminal area fee among others.

He added that the ministerial report on the concession raised questions on the period of the agreement stating that “it is not clear whether the concession agreement is for 15 years or 35 years. We are also not clear about when to start counting the contract period of the agreement”.